Terms & Conditions

The Lower to Middle Palaeolithic transition in northern Iberia: new data from Arlanpe Cave

Joseba Rios-Garaizar, Diego Garate, Asier Gómez-Olivencia, Eneko Iriarte-Avilés, Arantza Aranburu-Artano, Diego Arceredillo-Alonso, Alejandro Garcia, Maria José Iriarte-Chiapusso, Javier Moreno, Xabier Murelaga, José Eugenio Ortíz, Trinidad Torres, Ziortza San Pedro-Calleja & Lydia Zapata-Peña

Figure 1
Figure 1. Map of the western Pyrenean region with relevant Lower Palaeolithic or early Middle Palaeolithic sites: 1) Arlanpe; 2) Axlor; 3) Lezetxiki; 4) Mendieta I & II; 5) Urrunaga; 6) La Garma; 7) Morín & Covalejos; 8) El Castillo; 9) Astigarraga; 10) Irikaitz; 11) Arnaileta; 12) Urbasa; 13) Pamplona Bassin; 14) Murba; 15) Matamala; 16) Najerilla Valley; 17) Atapuerca; 18) San Quirce de Río Pisuerga; 19) Lestaulan; 20) Le Tambaou; 21) Bouheben; 22) L'Estret de Tragó; 23) Lanne Darré; 24) Montmaurin; 25) Barbas I; 26) La Micoque; 27) Grotte Vaufrey; 28) La Plane Mare; 29) Camp de Peyre; 30) Pradayrol.
Click to enlarge.
Introduction

The Lower to Middle Palaeolithic transition in Western Europe is a long and complex process that is difficult to assess from an epistemological, chronological and behavioural point of view (Monnier 2006). Around 300 kyrs BP some elements of material culture, such as the Levallois technique (Mode 3) appear in several assemblages, but undisputed Mode 2 or Acheulean assemblages are still present until almost OIS (Oxygen Isotope Stage) 5e (≈115 kyrs BP) in different regions (Santonja & Villa 2006). These final Acheulean assemblages share Middle and Lower Palaeolithic traits and are crucial to understanding the patchwork nature of the transformation processes of Neanderthal societies during this period.

Arlanpe is a small cave (Universal Transverse Mercator coordinates: x: 519254; y: 4782262; z: 204) located on the northern slope of the Cantabrian Cordillera, 25km from the Atlantic coast in northern Spain (Figures 1 & 3). This is a strategic location, close to a low mountain pass (600m asl) located upstream from the site that connects with the Alavese plateau, and near the confluence of two main rivers, the Arratia and the Ibaizabal that drain a major part of Vizcaya province (Figure 2).


Figure 2
Figure 2. DTM (Digital Topographic Model) of Biscay region with the position of Arlanpe Cave.
Click to enlarge.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Location of the entrance of the cave in the Arlanpeko Atxa (Arlanpe Crag).
Click to enlarge.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Plan of Arlanpe Cave with the excavation areas shaded.
Click to enlarge.

Excavations have been ongoing since 2006 and cover a surface area of 11m² (Figure 4). Two different excavation areas have yielded evidence for the Upper Acheulean (Levels C and D), the Upper Solutrean (Levels II and III) (Rios-Garaizar et al. 2008b), the Magdalenian (Level I), as well as Bronze Age and Late Roman occupations. The Upper Acheulean level D is notable for its good preservation compared to other assemblages in the Cantabrian region (Arrizabalaga 2005–2006). The ongoing project comprises systematic excavation and analysis of archaeological and paleontological material and geological processes to characterise these occupations and the relevance that they have towards assessing the nature of the Lower–Middle Palaeolithic transition in Western Europe.

First results

Level D has so far been exposed over a surface area of 3m² and to a depth of 0.3m (Figures 5 & 6). It is formed by endokarstic sand and clay, and its surface has been reworked by running water during the formation of level C. Level D has yielded abundant well-preserved faunal and lithic remains. Regarding the faunal remains (Table 1), herbivores constitute the majority of the assemblage and the most represented species is Pyrenean ibex (Capra pyrenaica), followed by chamois (Rupicapra sp.). Medium- to large-size carnivores such as bear (Ursus sp.), fox (Vulpes vulpes), spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), dhole (Cuon alpines) or leopard (Panthera pardus) are also represented, but taphonomic analysis reveals that they had a secondary role in the bone accumulation. This level has also yielded a large microvertebrate assemblage including mammals, reptilians and amphibians. The presence of Apodemus sylvaticus-flavicollis (woodmouse) and dormice (Eliomys quercinus and Glis glis) indicates a woody environment. The presence of these taxa decreases towards the top of the level indicating a subtle change towards colder conditions.


Figure 5
Figure 5. Photograph of the section along the western edge of excavation square H29 at the rear of the cave.
Click to enlarge.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Section drawing along the western edge of excavation squares H29 & H30 at the rear of the cave.
Click to enlarge.

IdentificationNR
Table 1. Taxonomic determination and number of remains (NR) from level D (2006-9 seasons).
Rhinocerontidae indet.2
Artiodactyla indet.123
Cervidae indet.6
Cervus elaphus4
Rangifer tarandus1
Capreolus capreolus6
Bovidae indet.1
Caprinae indet.3
Rupicapra sp.18
Capra pyrenaica38
Large bovid (Bos primigenius/Bison priscus)3
Total herbivores205
Carnivora indet.13
Canidae indet.3
Cuon alpinus2
Vulpes vulpes4
Ursus sp.12
Meles meles1
Crocuta crocuta3 (2 small fragments of a coprolite also found)
Panthera pardus2
Total carnivores40
Birds24
TOTAL269
Figure 7
Figure 7. Handaxe made on silicified mudstone recovered in surface.
Click to enlarge.

Initial results from pollen analysis suggest relatively warm and wet climate conditions during the formation of level D, with a predominance of deciduous trees among arboreal taxa, for example hazel (Corylus), lime (Tilia), birch (Betula), alder (Alnus) and oak (Quercus robur tp.). Grasses and heath plants (Ericaceae) dominate in the herbaceous-shrub vegetation, and the values of fern spores are around 45 per cent. The combined evidence suggests a rocky-wooded environment in relatively warm and wet conditions that suggest an Eemian age for level D. Amino acid racemization dating is ongoing, and a single bear incisor from the upper part of level D has yielded a minimum age of 63 kyrs BP, but more dates are obviously needed.

Stone tools are relatively abundant (>50 pieces larger than 20mm per m²). Raw materials include non-local flint (available 30–70km away) as well as local materials including silicified mudstone, quartz or sandstone. The ratio of local:non-local raw materials is 2:1. These local materials exhibit less retouch modification and are considerably larger in size. There is evidence of handaxe production (Figure 7, 8) in level D as well as in the altered level C. Flint tools were produced using the Levallois technique and imported to the site as intensely retouched formal tools, mainly sidescrapers (Figure 9). Silicified mudstone is exploited in situ by SSDA (Système par surface de débitage alterne) (Forestier 1993) and discoid techniques to obtain large partially cortical flakes. Formal tools made on mudstone (see Figure 8, 9) are mainly thick denticulate and naturally-backed knives.


Figure 8
Figure 8. Massive tools (including handaxes and bifacially backed flakes) made on sandstone and silicified mudstone.
Click to enlarge.
Figure 9
Figure 9. a) Pseudo-Levallois point made on silicified mudstone; b) flint Levallois flake transformed into convergent sidescraper; c) convergent Quina sidescraper made on flint; d) cortical SSDA flake with use-wear made on silicified mudstone.
Click to enlarge.

Discussion

The transition between the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic is a poorly documented period in Western Europe. Few sites in the Cantabrian region and south-western France provide information about tool provisioning and subsistence strategies during the Upper Acheulean. Thus, Arlanpe Cave offers a rare glimpse into the changes that took place from the Lower to the Middle Palaeolithic among Neanderthal communities.

Our ongoing studies reveal that occupation occurred during relatively warm and humid conditions, probably corresponding to the Eemian interglacial (MIS 5e). The faunal assemblage shows a high taxonomic diversity, reflecting the variety of landscapes around the site. Despite the abundance of carnivores at the site, humans were the main agents of the faunal accumulation. The lithic assemblage reveals some transitional features, including simpler technologies applied to local raw materials as well as the presence in the same level of well-developed Levallois (Mousterian-like) technology. This could reflect individual provisioning strategies mainly relying on local raw materials supplemented by good quality non-local tools.

Similar features have been described for late Lower Palaeolithic and early Middle Palaeolithic (200–115 kyr BP) assemblages of Western Europe (Santonja & Villa 2006; Slimak et al. 2010; Turq et al. 2010). In the eastern Cantabrian region only the cave of Lezetxiki has produced comparable results in climatic, faunal and lithic records (Arrizabalaga et al. 2010; Castaños et al. 2011). These features are clearly different from those exhibited on older sites in the same region (Arrizabalaga & Iriarte 2008; Rios-Garaizar et al. 2008a), which have yielded evidence for more expedient technologies. Arlanpe Cave's Level D also distinguishes itself from local Mousterian cave assemblages with a chronological range of 80–40 kyrs BP where more complex technological management or subsistence strategies, extensive landscape use and solid evidence for the controlled use of fire are evident (Rios-Garaizar 2009).

Acknowledgements

The project is funded by the Barandiaran Foundation, the Regional Government of Vizcaya, and the Basque Government. Asier Gómez-Olivencia has a postdoctoral fellowship from the Ministerio de Educación (Programa Nacional de Movilidad de Recursos Humanos del Plan Nacional de I+D+I (2008–2011) and also receives support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Proyecto CGL2009-12703-C03-03). Thanks to Rolf Quam for revising our Iberian English.

References

  • ARRIZABALAGA, A. 2005–2006. Las primeras ocupaciones humanas en el Pirineo Occidental y Montes Vascos: un estado de la cuestión en 2005. Munibe (Antropologia-Arkeologia) Homenaje al Prof Jesús Altuna 57: 53–70.
  • ARRIZABALAGA, A. & M.J. IRIARTE. 2008. Irikaitz (Zestoa, Paí s Vasco): tafonomía d'un depósito pleistocénico ao aire libre, in E. Méndez Quintas (ed.) Estudos sobre Paleolítico: homenaxe a X.M. Álvarez Blázquez: 139–62. Gondomar: Instituto de Estudios Miñoranos.
  • ARRIZABALAGA, A., M.J. IRIARTE & A. VILLALUENGA. 2010. Labeko Koba y Lezetxiki (País Vasco): dos yacimientos, una problemá tica común, in E. Baquedano & J. Rosell (ed.) Reunión de científicos sobre cubiles de hiena (y otros grandes carní voros) en los yacimientos arqueológicos de la Península Ibérica (1. 2009, Alcalá de Henares). Zona Arquelógica 13: 322–34. Madrid: Comunidad de Madrid, Museo Arqueológico Regional.
  • CASTAÑOS, P., X. MURELAGA, A. ARRIZABALAGA & M.J. IRIARTE. 2011. First evidence of Macaca sylvanus (Primates, Cercopithecidae) from the Late Pleistocene of Lezetxiki II Cave (Basque Country, Spain). Journal of Human Evolution 60: 816–20.
  • FORESTIER, H. 1993. Le Clactonien: mise en application d'une nouvelle méthode de débitage s'inscrivant dans la variabilité des systèmes de production lithique du Paléolithique Ancien. Paléo 5: 53–82.
  • MONNIER, G.F. 2006. The Lower/Middle Paleolithic periodization in Western Europe: an evaluation. Current Anthropology 47: 709–744.
  • RIOS-GARAIZAR, J. 2009. Variabilidad tecnológica en el Paleolítico Medio de los Pirineos Occidentales: una expresión de las dinámicas históricas de las sociedades neandertales. Treballs d'Arqueologia 14: 172–95.
  • RIOS-GARAIZAR, J., E. IRIARTE-AVILÉS, D. GARATE, A. CEARRETA & M.J. IRIARTE. 2008a. The Mendieta site (Sopelana, Biscay province, northern Spain): palaeoenvironment and formation processes of a Lower Palaeolithic open-air archaeological deposit. Comptes Rendus Palevol 7: 453–62.
  • RIOS-GARAIZAR, J., E. IRIARTE-AVILÉS, D. GARATE, A. GOMEZ-OLIVENCIA & Z. SAN PEDRO-CALLEJA. 2008b. Nuevos datos sobre la transición entre el Solutrense Superior y el Magdaleniense inferior en la regió n cantábrica: la cueva de Arlanpe (Lemoa, Bizkaia). Sautuola 14: 95–104.
  • SANTONJA, M. & P. VILLA. 2006. The Acheulean of Western Europe, in N. Goren-Inbar & G. Sharon (ed.) Axe age: Acheulean toolmaking from quarry to discard: 429–78. London. Equinox.
  • SLIMAK, L., J.E. LEWIS, E. CREGUT-BONNOURE, L. METZ, V. OLLIVIER, P. ANDRE, J. CHRZAVZEZ, Y.GIRAUD, M. JEANNET & F. MAGNIN. 2010. Le Grand Abri aux Puces, a Mousterian site from the Last Interglacial: paleogeography, paleoenvironment, and new excavation results. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 2747–61.
  • TURQ, A., M. BRENET, D. COLONGE, M. JARRY, L.A. LELOUVIER, M. O'FARRELL & J. JAUBERT. 2010. The first human occupations in southwestern France: a revised summary twenty years after the Abbeville/Saint Riquier colloquium. Quaternary International 223/4: 383–98.

Authors

*Author for correspondence

  • Joseba Rios-Garaizar*
    Departamento de Ciencias Históricas, Universidad de Cantabria, Ed. Interfacultativo, Avenida de los Castros s/n Santander, Cantabria 39005, Spain (jorios76@gmail.com)
  • Diego Garate
    Arkeologi Museoa, Escaleras de Mallona, 2, Bilbao, Bizkaia 48006, Spain (diegogarate@harpea.org)
  • Asier Gómez-Olivencia
    Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolution, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK (asiergo@gmail.com)
  • Eneko Iriarte-Avilés
    Archaeology and Anthropology, Institució Milá i Fontanals-CSIC, Egipcíaques, 15, Barcelona 08001, Spain (eneko.iriarte@imf.csic.es)
  • Arantza Aranburu-Artano
    Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad del País Vasco/EHU, Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Bizkaia 48940, Spain (arantza.aranburu@ehu.es)
  • Diego Arceredillo-Alonso
    Departmento de Geología, Universidad de Salamanca, Plaza de la Merced s/n, Salamanca, Castilla y León 37008, Spain (rebaqui@hotmail.com)
  • Alejandro Garcia
    International Institute for Prehistoric Research of Cantabria, University of Cantabria, Edif. Interfacultativo, Avda. Los Castros, s/n, Santander, Cantabria 39006, Spain (alejandro.garciamoreno@hotmail.com)
  • Maria José Iriarte-Chiapusso
    Departamento de Geografía, Prehistoria y Arqueología, Universidad del País Vasco/EHU, C/Tomás y Valiente s/n, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba 01006, Spain (mariajose.iriarte@ehu.es)
  • Javier Moreno
    Unión de Espeleólogos Vascos, Atzeko Kale, 30, Oñati, Gipuzkoa, 20560, Spain (azhenhesia@yahoo.es)
  • Xabier Murelaga
    Departamento de Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Universidad del País Vasco/EHU, Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Bizkaia 48940, Spain (xabier.murelaga@ehu.es)
  • José Eugenio Ortíz
    Laboratorio de Estratigrafía Biomolecular. Escuela de Minas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ríos Rosas 21, Madrid 28003, Spain (joseeugenio.ortiz@upm.es)
  • Trinidad Torres
    Laboratorio de Estratigrafía Biomolecular. Escuela de Minas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ríos Rosas 21, Madrid 28003, Spain (trinidad.torres@upm.es)
  • Ziortza San Pedro-Calleja
    Museo Vasco, Plaza Miguel de Unamuno, 4, Bilbao, Bizkaia 48006, Spain (harpea@hotmail.com)
  • Lydia Zapata-Peña
    Departamento de Geografía, Prehistoria y Arqueología, Universidad del País Vasco/EHU, C/Tomás y Valiente s/n, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba 01006, Spain (lydia.zapata@ehu.es)

Back to Top